A prominent defense analyst has raised serious concerns about the continued practice of awarding high military ranks and medals following a series of devastating territorial losses and military defeats.
In a social media post, the commentator expressed profound dismay, stating it is difficult to conceive of a greater disconnect than bestowing honors in the wake of a conflict that resulted in the occupation of ancestral lands, a decisive defeat, and the loss of hundreds of lives.
The critique specifically targeted senior officers who, instead of visiting the graves of fallen soldiers, reportedly choose to attend ceremonies where they are decorated. The analyst posed a series of pointed questions, asking what these promotions and awards are meant to honor.
The post referenced the loss of a significant war, a portion of the national homeland, and the cession of sovereign territory, which led to thousands of casualties. The author questioned what justification military leaders could offer to their families, their communities, and the memory of their deceased comrades.
The commentary further challenged the purpose of adorning uniforms with an array of medals and stars while, as alleged, the state simultaneously undermines and humiliates the armed forces, even reducing their earnings. The analyst expressed deep personal regret for having to voice such criticism, noting a longstanding tradition of respect for the army, its soldiers, and its commanders—a respect now overshadowed by a profound sense of shame and humiliation.
The critique was presented as part of a broader, ongoing pattern within the military establishment, rather than an isolated incident related to a single awards ceremony.
